(Note: To play the variations located in the [variation brackets] simply click on the move with your mouse.)

Bouzoukis, Charlie (2281) - Gertler, Dave (2343) [A45]
Delaware State Championsip Round 5, 12.01.2002

GERTLER: Entering the fifth and final round of this year's Delaware State Open Chess Championship, I had 3.5 points, after drawing with IM Ed Formanek of Pennsylvania. Charlie Bouzoukis had 3 points, having taken half-point byes in the two morning rounds. If Charlie (the defending state champion) could beat me, he would retain his title, but if I won or drew, it would be mine.

GERTLER: This was my fifth tournament game against Charlie -- and my fourth with the black pieces. In three of those games, we had explored lines in the Guioco Piano. Having brushed up on my defenses to various treatments of 1.e4 e5, I felt ready for this game.

GERTLER: We shook hands, and Charlie calmly played:

1.d2-d4

GERTLER: So much for my preparation! Well, how much could he know about Queen's pawn games, anyway?

BOUZOUKIS: My last two games with white against Dave ended in draws after 1.e4 e5. Needing a win, I decided to try something different.

1...Ng8-f6 2.Bc1-g5

GERTLER: Aha! He had prepared the Trompowsky Attack, one of those systems that is fairly easy to learn and gives White reasonable chances for an advantage. In some blitz games on the internet (about the only chess I had played for a couple of years), I had been trying a defense to the Trompowsky that I had seen in a magazine. Time to test it out in real life!

2...e7-e6 3.e2-e4 c7-c5

GERTLER: This is the line I had been playing. Most common is 3. ... h6, when White often plays 4.Bxf6 and then tries to establish a strong center. It seems odd to ignore the pin (as I did), but after 4.e5 h6, Black gets a decent position. Charlie now thought for about 25 minutes before deciding on his fourth move -- a large chunk of the 30/90 time control.

BOUZOUKIS: This move, which Dave played instantly, is not mentioned in any of my sources, including ECO. They focus almost exclusively on 3...h6 4.Bf6 Qf6. What an unpleasant surprise, and on move 3 no less!

4.d4-d5

BOUZOUKIS: Played after long thought. I also considered 4.e5, 4.Nf3, and 4.c3.

GERTLER: I didn't remember what I was supposed to do against this move, so I spent nearly 25 minutes here myself!

4...Qd8-a5+

BOUZOUKIS: I was worried about 4...Qb6, since 5.Nc3 Qb2 6.Nb5 fails to 6...Qb4+ and 7...Qe4+. Instead, 5.Bf6 gf 6.b3 looks unclear [4...Qd8-b6 5.Nb1-c3 Qb6xb2 6.Nc3-b5 Qb2-b4+ ]

5.Bg5-d2

GERTLER: 5.Qd2 would also be good. For about the next eight moves, we both set up a position that is similar to a main-line Benoni Defense, except that White has a c-pawn in this game (rather than an e-pawn as in a Benoni).

5...Qa5-c7 6.Nb1-c3

BOUZOUKIS: And so we have a Benoni - type opening with an early ...Qc7 for Black and an unusual Bd2 for White. In spite of the misplaced bishop, I was happy to have a double-edged position.

6...a7-a6 7.a2-a4 e6xd5 8.e4xd5 d7-d6 9.h2-h3 g7-g6 10.Ng1-f3 Bf8-g7 11.Bf1-e2

BOUZOUKIS: I was tempted to play 11. Qe2+, with the idea of 11...Qe7 12.Bf4, pressuring the d-pawn. In the postmortem Dave suggested 11...Kf8, when White's Queen is misplaced, and attempts to untangle by 12.Qd3 or 12.Qc4 run into 12...Bf5 and 12...b5, respectively. [11.Qd1-e2+ Qc7-e7 12.Bd2-f4 ]

11...0-0 12.0-0 Nb8-d7 13.Bd2-f4

GERTLER: I expected this move, which is part of the natural plan of putting pressure on my d6 pawn.

13...Rf8-e8 14.Be2-c4 Nf6-e4

GERTLER: Since Black is cramped in a Benoni-type formation, he usually benefits from piece trades. After his next move, though, my Knight is pinned, and soon he develops pressure along the open e-file.

15.Rf1-e1 Nd7-f6 16.Nc3xe4 Re8xe4 17.Re1xe4 Nf6xe4 18.Qd1-e2

GERTLER: Winning control of this file gives White a clear advantage. I can't grab a pawn with 18. ... Bxc3, as 19.Rb1 Nc3 20. Qe8+ wins a piece.

18...Ne4-f6
[18...Bg7xb2 19.Ra1-b1 Ne4-c3 20.Qe2-e8+ ]

19.Ra1-e1

GERTLER: I panicked a bit here, thinking that after the natural developing move 19. ... Bd7 he could put me in real trouble with 20.Qe7. However, I missed the reply 20. ... Re8, when after 21.Qxd6 Qxd6 22.Bxd6 I play some combination of the moves ... Rxe1+, ... Ne4, and ... Bxb2 (with ... b5 possibly tossed in at some point). My pawns are not the only ones that lack protection in this position! Since I hadn't seen that whole line, I decided to lunge forward on the queenside in order to generate some counterplay and deflect him from his simple scheme of domination.

19...b7-b5

BOUZOUKIS: Another surprise. Although this sacrifice is thematic, it succeeds here in part thanks to my time trouble (which I realize is no excuse!) . I expected simply 19...Bd7, with the idea that 20.Qe7 can be met by 20... Re8 21.Qd6 Re1+ 22.Ne1 Qd6 23.Bd6 Nef, regaining the pawn. [19...Bc8-d7 20.Qe2-e7 Ra8-e8 21.Qe7xd6 Qc7xd6 22.Bf4xd6 Re8xe1+ 23.Nf3xe1 Nf6-e4 ]

20.a4xb5 a6xb5 21.Bc4xb5

GERTLER: For some reason, I hadn't expected this move. Maybe I had originally thought his d-pawn was hanging here, but it's not! I was glad that I noticed 21. ... Nxd5?? 22. Qe8+ Bf8 23.Qxf8+! Kxf8 24.Bh6+ Kg8 25.Re8 mate. Lines such as that one convinced me that my King needed some air, which explains my next move.

21...h7-h6

BOUZOUKIS: Of course not 21...Nd5?? 22.Qe8+ Bf8 23.Qf8+, mating. [21...Nf6xd5 22.Qe2-e8+ Bg7-f8 23.Qe8xf8+ Kg8xf8 24.Bf4-h6+ Kf8-g8 25.Re1-e8# ]

22.c2-c4

BOUZOUKIS: The first misstep. 22.Bc4 is better, not allowing 22...Ra2 and keeping the queenside pawns flexible.

22...Ra8-a2

GERTLER: I don't have all that much play, but at least my poor Rook isn't locked in on a8 any longer.

23.Qe2-e7 Qc7xe7 24.Re1xe7 Bg7-f8

GERTLER: Before playing 22. ... Ra2, I had looked at this position, wondering whether 25.Bxd6 would be a strong exchange sacrifice. If he could then win my c-pawn, he would get connected passed pawns supported by two strong bishops, but 25. ... Rxb2 (eyeing his Bishop and thus threatening .. . Nxd5) complicates matters immediately. Charlie probably rejected this double-edged line because he was already a pawn ahead with a good position. However, if I can hold onto my d6 pawn for a while, I can make it tough for him to convert that advantage.

25.Re7-c7

BOUZOUKIS: Active-looking, but the rook doesn't really accomplish much here. 25.Re2 appears to be a sounder choice, intending something like Ne1, f3, and Kf2, regrouping. 25.Bd6 is interesting, but after 25...Rb2 26.Rc7 (26.Bc5 Be7 27.Be7 Nd5) Bd6 (threatening mate) 27.Rc8+ Kg7 and 28...Ne4, Black looks OK. [25.Bf4xd6 Ra2xb2 26.Re7-c7 Bf8xd6 27.Rc7xc8+ Kg8-g7 ]

25...Bc8-f5 26.b2-b3 g6-g5

GERTLER: We each had less than five minutes to reach move 30 at this point, so I decided to make him decide where to put his bishop. I anticipated (and feared) that he would play 27.Be3, keeping a solid position. Instead, he chose a move that gave me a glimmer of hope.

27.Bf4-g3

BOUZOUKIS: 27.Be3 would have avoided the problems that follow, but it's too passive to inspire much confidence. Perhaps the best practical choice was to try 27.Bg5 or 27.Ng5 with three pawns for the piece.

27...Nf6-e4

GERTLER: Now his Bishop cannot avoid being traded (since 28.Bh2?? is met by Ra1+). In addition, the base of his pawn chain (at b3) is subject to attack. Life was getting a bit better.

28.Rc7-c6 h6-h5

BOUZOUKIS: A strong move that takes advantage of 27.Bg3.

29.h3-h4

BOUZOUKIS: After this Black can force a draw. For better or worse, 29.Ng5 Ng5 30.Bd6 had to be tried.

GERTLER: My threat of ... h4 forced his hand. At this point, I suddenly spied a strange but wonderful tactic that could bring me my long-sought draw. I knew I wanted to play ... Ra1+ and ... g4 on my next two moves, but did it matter which one came first? I spent nearly all my remaining time trying to answer that question, and having failed to reach a firm conclusion, I simply chose the check.

29...Ra2-a1+ 30.Kg1-h2 g5-g4 31.Nf3-g5

BOUZOUKIS: Completely overlooking Dave's next move, which draws. It's probably just as well, though; had I seen it I might have tried 31.Ng1, which loses to 31...Ng3 32.fg Ra2 followed by 33...Be4.

GERTLER: Although we had just reached the 30-move time control, Charlie played this move quickly. He doesn't really have any choice, as 31.Ng1? actually loses to ... Nxg3 32.fxg3 Ra2 followed by ... Be4, breaking through on g2. Still, I was excited to see his move, as I knew I could grab the draw. [31.Nf3-g1 Ne4xg3 32.f2xg3 Ra1-a2 ]

31...Ne4-d2

GERTLER: A shocking perpetual check arises! He has no good way to prevent ... Nf1+, followed by discovering a check with the Knight and then returning it to f1 for another check.

32.Bg3xd6 Nd2-f1+

BOUZOUKIS: A nice drawing maneuver, bringing an abrupt end to a hard-fought game.

GERTLER: I offered a draw here, and Charlie accepted it andgraciously congratulated me on becoming state champion. I was delighted with the outcome and relieved that this stressful battle was finally over.

GERTLER: A funny thing happened the next day, though. I entered the game into the strong chess program "Fritz" for analysis. Fritz pointed out that if Charlie had played 33. Kh1 from the final position, I would have mated him by force with 33. ... g3! This move denies h2 to his King; it also frees g4 for a knight check (after I first discover check with ... Ne3). I assume that Charlie would have played the more natural 33.Kg1, leading to the immediate perpetual check, but the thought that I could win this game never crossed my mind. I guess a draw was the proper outcome. 1/2-1/2